4.6 Review

Gene therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: rationale, clinical trials and future directions

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 105, 期 2, 页码 151-157

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316195

关键词

angiogenesis; clinical trial; degeneration; genetics; retina

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  2. UCL Institute of Ophthalmology
  3. Fight for Sight
  4. Moorfields Eye Hospital Special Trustees
  5. Moorfields Eye Charity
  6. Retina UK
  7. Foundation Fighting Blindness (USA)
  8. Wellcome Trust [099173/Z/12/Z]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Age-related macular degeneration is a leading cause of irreversible blindness, and antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy has improved the management of neovascular AMD. Gene therapy approaches show promise in addressing challenges, but there are still controversies and safety concerns.
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is one of the leading causes of irreversible blindness in the developed world. Antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy has transformed the management and outcome of neovascular AMD (nAMD), although the need for repeated intravitreal injections-even lifelong-and the related complications, high drug costs, frequent clinic visits and repeated imaging have resulted in an enormous burden both to healthcare systems and patients. The application of gene therapy approaches for sustained delivery of a range of antiangiogenic proteins has the promise of helping to address these aforementioned challenges. A number of early phase clinical trials of gene therapy in nAMD have provided encouraging results, with many more ongoing or anticipated. There remain significant areas of controversy, including regarding the optimal treatment targets, routes of administration and potential safety concerns. In this review we aim to provide an update of the current status of gene therapy for nAMD and briefly discuss future prospects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据