4.4 Review

Effect of walnut consumption on markers of blood glucose control: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 124, 期 7, 页码 641-653

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114520001415

关键词

Nuts; Walnuts; Glycaemic control; Blood glucose; Systematic reviews; Meta-analyses

资金

  1. California Walnut Commission
  2. Nuts for Life
  3. International Nut and Dried Fruit Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease increasing in global prevalence. Although habitual consumption of walnuts is associated with reduced risk of CVD, there is inconsistent evidence for the impact of walnut consumption on markers of glycaemic control. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the effect of walnut consumption on markers of blood glucose control. A systematic search of Medline, PubMed, CINAHL and Cochrane databases (to 2 March 2019) was conducted. Inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials conducted with adults which assessed the effect of walnut consumption on fasting blood glucose and insulin, glycated Hb and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted to assess the weighted mean differences (WMD) for each outcome. Risk of bias in studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0. Sixteen studies providing eighteen effect sizes were included in the review. Consumption of walnuts did not result in significant changes in fasting blood glucose levels (WMD: 0 center dot 331 mg/dl; 95 % CI -0 center dot 817, 1 center dot 479) or other outcome measures. Studies were determined to have either 'some concerns' or be at 'high risk' of bias. There was no evidence of an effect of walnut consumption on markers of blood glucose control. These findings suggest that the known favourable effects of walnut intake on CVD are not mediated via improvements in glycaemic control. Given the high risk of bias observed in the current evidence base, there is a need for further high-quality randomised controlled trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据