4.6 Article

Inhibition of Band 3 tyrosine phosphorylation: a new mechanism for treatment of sickle cell disease

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 190, 期 4, 页码 599-609

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.16671

关键词

anion exchanger 1; erythrocyte membrane; haemoglobinopathy; sickle cell disease; tyrosine phosphorylation

资金

  1. NIH [R01GM24417-40, 1RF1 NS110049-01, R01HL133574, T32HL134622]
  2. NSF [1552782]
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1552782] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many hypotheses have been proposed to explain how a glutamate to valine substitution in sickle haemoglobin (HbS) can cause sickle cell disease (SCD). We propose and document a new mechanism in which elevated tyrosine phosphorylation of Band 3 initiates sequelae that cause vaso-occlusion and the symptoms of SCD. In this mechanism, denaturation of HbS and release of heme generate intracellular oxidants which cause inhibition of erythrocyte tyrosine phosphatases, thus permitting constitutive tyrosine phosphorylation of Band 3. This phosphorylation in turn induces dissociation of the spectrin-actin cytoskeleton from the membrane, leading to membrane weakening, discharge of membrane-derived microparticles (which initiate the coagulation cascade) and release of cell-free HbS (which consumes nitric oxide) and activates the endothelium to express adhesion receptors). These processes promote vaso-occlusive events which cause SCD. We further show that inhibitors of Syk tyrosine kinase block Band 3 tyrosine phosphorylation, prevent release of cell-free Hb, inhibit discharge of membrane-derived microparticles, increase sickle cell deformability, reduce sickle cell adhesion to human endothelial cells, and enhance sickle cell flow through microcapillaries. In view of reports that imatinib (a Syk inhibitor) successfully treats symptoms of sickle cell disease, we suggest that Syk tyrosine kinase inhibitors warrant repurposing as potential treatments for SCD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据