4.7 Review

Virtual screening web servers: designing chemical probes and drug candidates in the cyberspace

期刊

BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 1790-1818

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaa034

关键词

virtual screening; in silico drug design; chemical biology

资金

  1. Inserm Institute, Lille I-Site and Lille Region

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interaction between life sciences and advancing technology leads to continuous growth of chemical data, with virtual screening methods being popular in pharmaceutical research. Web-based tools assist scientists in conducting virtual screening experiments, contributing to the design of bioactive molecules and drug development teaching.
The interplay between life sciences and advancing technology drives a continuous cycle of chemical data growth; these data are most often stored in open or partially open databases. In parallel, many different types of algorithms are being developed to manipulate these chemical objects and associated bioactivity data. Virtual screening methods are among the most popular computational approaches in pharmaceutical research. Today, user-friendly web-based tools are available to help scientists perform virtual screening experiments. This article provides an overview of internet resources enabling and supporting chemical biology and early drug discovery with a main emphasis on web servers dedicated to virtual ligand screening and small-molecule docking. This survey first introduces some key concepts and then presents recent and easily accessible virtual screening and related target-fishing tools as well as briefly discusses case studies enabled by some of these web services. Notwithstanding further improvements, already available web-based tools not only contribute to the design of bioactive molecules and assist drug repositioning but also help to generate new ideas and explore different hypotheses in a timely fashion while contributing to teaching in the field of drug development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据