Long-term follow-up after PFO device closure: Outcomes and Complications in a Single-center Experience

ObjectivesTo describe medium- to long-term follow-up of patients undergoing device closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) for stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). BackgroundTranscatheter device closure of PFO continues to be used for secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke or TIA, but data are lacking regarding long-term outcomes. MethodsWe reviewed the Mayo Clinic Rochester PFO database for patients who underwent device closure of PFO for secondary prevention of stroke/TIA from December 2001 to June 2012. Demographic, clinical, procedural, and follow-up data were reviewed. Recurrence rate of stroke/TIA were calculated. Data were analyzed to identify risk factors of recurrent neurologic events. ResultsSeven hundred and thirty patients (mean age 53 years; 40% female) were included in our study. Most patients (72%) had cryptogenic stroke as their qualifying event for PFO closure. There were no procedure-related deaths or strokes. The most commonly used device was the Amplatzer Septal Occluder (82%). Median follow-up was 6 years. A 3.9% of patients had documented residual right-to-left shunting at last echocardiogram. Recurrent stroke and/or TIA were reported in 45 patients, (6.3% of patients with follow-up data). Patients who experienced recurrent stroke/TIA were older and had a higher rate of diabetes and hypertension than those who did not. The presence of residual shunt did not correlate with risk of recurrent events. ConclusionsDevice closure of PFO can be performed safely with very good long-term resolution of atrial shunting. Recurrent neurologic events after PFO closure may reflect additional comorbid risk factors unrelated to the potential for paradoxical embolism. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.