4.4 Article

Cost analysis of depression using the national insurance system in South Korea: a comparison of depression and treatment-resistant depression

期刊

BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05153-1

关键词

Costs and cost analysis; Depression; Depressive disorder; treatment-resistant; National Health Programs

资金

  1. Janssen Korea Ltd. [RRA-17716]
  2. Janssen Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundThe incidence and burden of depressive disorders are increasing in South Korea. There are many differences between pharmaceutically treated depression (PTD) and treatment-resistant depression (TRD), including the economic consequences; however, to our knowledge, the economic burden of depression is understudied in South Korea. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to calculate the different economic costs of PTD and TRD in South Korea, specifically by comparing several aspects of medical care.MethodsThis study comprised patients aged 18 and over who were newly prescribed antidepressants for more than 28days with a depression code included from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2012, by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA). TRD was classified as more than two antidepressant regimen failures in PTD patients. The cost was calculated based on the cost reflected on the receipt registered with HIRA.ResultsOf the 834,694 patients with PTD, 34,812 patients (4.17%) were converted to TRD. The cost of medical care for TRD (6,610,487 KRW, 5881 USD) was approximately 5 times higher than the cost of non-TRD (1,273,045 KRW, 1133 USD) and was significantly higher for patients with or without depression and suicide codes. Medical expenses incurred by non-psychiatrists were roughly 1.7 times higher than those incurred by psychiatrists.ConclusionsTRD patients had significantly higher healthcare costs than PTD patients. Identifying these financial aspects of care for depression can help to establish a more effective policy to reduce the burden on mentally ill patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据