4.4 Article

Correlation between overweightness and the extent of coronary atherosclerosis among the South Caspian population

期刊

BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12872-020-01534-w

关键词

Body mass index; BMI; coronary artery disease; Waist circumference

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Reported effects of obesity on the extent of angiographic coronary artery disease(CAD) have been inconsistent. The present study aimed to investigate the relationships between the indices of obesity and other anthropometric markers with the extent of CAD. Methods This study was conducted on 1008 consecutive patients who underwent coronary angiography. Body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) were separately calculated for each patient. Extent, severity, and complexity of CAD were determined by the Gensini and SYNTAX scores. Results According to the results, there was a significant inverse correlation between the SYNTAX score with BMI (r = - 0.110;P < 0.001), WC (r = - 0.074;P = 0.018), and WHtR (r = - 0.089;P = 0.005). Furthermore, a significant inverse correlation was observed between the Gensini score with BMI (r = - 0.090;P = 0.004) and WHtR (r = - 0.065;P = 0.041). However, the results of multivariate linear regression analysis did not show any association between the SYNTAX and Gensini scores with the indices of obesity and overweight. On the other hand, the patients with an unhealthy WC had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) (P = 0.004) and hypertension (HTN) (P < 0.001), compared to the patients with healthy values. Coexistence of HTN and DM was more prevalent in subjects with an unhealthy WC and WHR, compared to that in those with healthy values (P = 0.002 andP = 0.032, respectively). Conclusion It seems that the anthropometric indices of obesity are not the predictors of the angiographic severity of CAD. However, they are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular risk factors and higher risk profile.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据