4.3 Article

Composite of medium-chain-length polyhydroxyalkanoates-co-methyl acrylate and carbon nanotubes as innovative electrodes modifier in microbial fuel cell

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 68, 期 2, 页码 307-318

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bab.1928

关键词

polyhydroxyalkanoates; microbial fuel cell; renewable energy; composite; carbon nanotubes

资金

  1. Universiti Malaya [FG024-17AFR, IIRG017A-2019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A microbial fuel cell combines electricity generation and wastewater treatment through metabolic activities of microorganisms. Enhancements through nanocomposites of oxidized carbon nanotubes and medium-chain-length polyhydroxyalkanoates help improve electrode function, leading to higher power output and better electron transfer efficiency. Superior biofilm growth on modified surfaces plays a key role in stable and elevated power output generation.
A microbial fuel cell is a sustainable and environmental-friendly device that combines electricity generation and wastewater treatment through metabolic activities of microorganisms. However, low power output from inadequate electron transfer to the anode electrode hampers its practical implementation. Nanocomposites of oxidized carbon nanotubes and medium-chain-length polyhydroxyalkanoates (mcl-PHA) grafted with methyl acrylate monomers enhance the electrochemical function of electrodes in microbial fuel cell. Extensive polymerization of methyl acrylate monomers within mcl-PHA matrix, and homogenous dispersion of carbon nanotubes within the graft matrix are responsible for the enhancement. Modified electrodes exhibit high conductivities, better redox peak and reduction of cell internal resistance up to 76%. A stable voltage output at almost 700 mV running for 225 H generates maximum power and current density of 351 mW/m(2) and 765 mA/m(2), respectively. Superior biofilm growth on modified surface is responsible for improved electron transfer to the anode hence stable and elevated power output generation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据