4.5 Article

Redox potential as a key parameter for monitoring and optimization of xylose fermentation with yeast Spathaspora passalidarum under limited-oxygen conditions

期刊

BIOPROCESS AND BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING
卷 43, 期 8, 页码 1509-1519

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00449-020-02344-2

关键词

Respiratory kinetic parameters; Second-generation ethanol; Volumetric oxygen transfer coefficient; Xylose fermentation

资金

  1. FAPESP [2016/06142-0, 2016/14567-0, 2017/04997-0]
  2. CNPq

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The determination of optimum values of volumetric oxygen transfer coefficient (k(L)a) for Spathaspora passalidarum is an important aspect for the optimization of ethanol production from pentoses since oxygen plays a key role on yeast metabolism. By studying the fermentation of a xylose and glucose mixture, the highest ethanol volumetric productivity was achieved at a k(L)a of 45 h(-1) (1.12 g(ethanol) L-1 h(-1)), reducing the fermentation time to half when compared to other oxygen-limiting conditions that were considered optimum for other native strains, besides increasing xylose consumption rates. The high cell density fermentation showed to be a good strategy to be applied in industrial processes with S. passalidarum, enabling the complete exhaustion of a high initial substrate concentration (90 g L-1) in less than 24 h, with a final ethanol titer of 28.61 (+/- 0.42) g L-1. By performing a detailed investigation on oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), it was possible to conclude that the highest ethanol formation rates were registered at oxireduction potential values around - 100 mV, becoming an important parameter to be controlled when oxygen-limiting conditions are applied in industrial fermentations. The oxygen availability also affected the activity of enzyme XR and its preference for NADH or NADPH, directly affecting the activity of enzyme XDH and the redox imbalance on the xylose pathway. In addition, respirometric parameters were determined for the yeast S. passalidarum under an aerobic growth condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据