4.5 Article

Bayesian latent multi-state modeling for nonequidistant longitudinal electronic health records

期刊

BIOMETRICS
卷 77, 期 1, 页码 78-90

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/biom.13261

关键词

Bayesian inference; continuous-time hidden Markov models; COPD; health trajectories; MCMC; nonequidistant longitudinal data analysis

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Canadian Institutes of HealthResearch

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study develops a continuous-time hidden Markov model to analyze longitudinal data with irregular visits and different types of observations, showing efficient implementation for large datasets through Bayesian inference and simulation studies.
Large amounts of longitudinal health records are now available for dynamic monitoring of the underlying processes governing the observations. However, the health status progression across time is not typically observed directly: records are observed only when a subject interacts with the system, yielding irregular and often sparse observations. This suggests that the observed trajectories should be modeled via a latent continuous-time process potentially as a function of time-varying covariates. We develop a continuous-time hidden Markov model to analyze longitudinal data accounting for irregular visits and different types of observations. By employing a specific missing data likelihood formulation, we can construct an efficient computational algorithm. We focus on Bayesian inference for the model: this is facilitated by an expectation-maximization algorithm and Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Simulation studies demonstrate that these approaches can be implemented efficiently for large data sets in a fully Bayesian setting. We apply this model to a real cohort where patients suffer from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with the outcome being the number of drugs taken, using health care utilization indicators and patient characteristics as covariates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据