4.7 Article

Magnolol alleviates Alzheimer's disease-like pathology in transgenic C. elegans by promoting microglia phagocytosis and the degradation of beta-amyloid through activation of PPAR-gamma

期刊

BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.109886

关键词

Magnolol; Alzheimer's disease; Transgenic; C. elegans; PPAR-gamma; Beta-amyloid

资金

  1. Postdoctoral Foundation of China [2018M642761]
  2. Special Research Project of Henan Province on Traditional Chinese Medicine [2018ZYD12, 2018ZY1009]
  3. Key Scientific Research Project Plan of Henan Higher Education Institutions [19A520002, 19A360021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to investigate whether magnolol (MG), a natural neolignane compound, can prevent AD induced by beta-amyloid (A beta) and the possible mechanisms involved. MG dose-dependently reduces A beta deposition, toxicity and memory impairment caused by A beta in transgenic C. elegans. More importantly, these effects are reversed by GW9662, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma) antagonist. MG is more effective in enhancing PPAR-gamma luciferase levels than honokiol (HK). Meanwhile, MG has the potential to bind with the ligand binding domain of PPAR-gamma (PPAR-gamma-LBD). As expected, MG inhibited the luciferase activity of NF-kappa B and its target genes of inflammatory cytokines, and this effect was blocked by GW9662. The luciferase activity of Nrf2-ARE expression can be activated by MG and decreased A beta-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS). The target gene LXR of PPAR-gamma is activated by MG, which upregulates ApoE and promotes microglia phagocytosis and the degradation of A beta, and these effects were also reversed by GW9662. In summary, MG can attenuate A beta-induced AD and the underlying mechanism is the reduction of inflammation and promotion of phagocytosis and degradation of A beta, which is dependent on PPAR-gamma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据