4.7 Article

Double layer effects in electrocatalysis: The oxygen reduction reaction and ethanol oxidation reaction on Au(111), Pt(111) and Ir(111) in alkaline media containing Na and Li cations

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 262, 期 -, 页码 41-47

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2015.09.010

关键词

Electrocatalysis; Surface spectators; Non covalent interactions; Cation effect; Oxygen reduction; Ethanol

资金

  1. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences [DE-AC0206CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxygen reduction and ethanol oxidation reactions were studied on Au(1 11), Pt(1 1 1) and Ir(1 1 1) in alkaline solutions containing sodium and/or lithium cations. By keeping the same (1 1 1) surface orientation and exploring oxophilicity trends and non-covalent interactions between OHad and alkali metal cations (AMC(n+)), we were able to gain deep insights into the multiple roles that OHad plays in these important electrocatalytic reactions. Cyclic voltammetry experiments revealed that OHad formation initiates at distinct electrode potentials, governed by the oxophilicity of the specific metal surface, with further OHad adlayer stabilization by non-covalent alkali-cation interactions and affecting the formation of a true oxide layer at higher electrode potentials. Although OHad is a simple spectator for the ORR, it promotes the ethanol oxidation reaction (EOR) at lower potentials and act as spectator at high OHad coverages. By changing the alkali metal cation at the interface (Li+) on more oxophilic surfaces, it was possible to promote the EOR even more, relative to Na+, without changing the product distribution for the reaction. This cation effect suggests that OHad-Li+(H2O)(x) clusters can stabilize the ethoxide adlayer, thus improving the EOR activity. Our results indicate the importance of the entire electrochemical interface in determining the electrocatalytic activity during reaction. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据