4.7 Article

Kinetic insight into the effect of the catalytic functions on selective conversion of cellulose to polyols on carbon-supported WO3 and Ru catalysts

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 269, 期 -, 页码 74-81

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2015.09.056

关键词

Cellulose; Ethylene glycol; Propylene glycol; Sorbitol; Tungsten trioxide; Solid base

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Efficient conversion of cellulose, the most abundant biomass on Earth, to chemicals in high yields remains a formidable challenge. Here, we report the marked change in the distribution of polyol products in the cellulose reaction on Ru/C and WO3/C, strongly depending on the competitive reactions of the glucose intermediate. WO3 crystallites not only promote, as a solid acid, the efficient hydrolysis of cellulose to glucose, but also catalyze the selective cleavage of the C-C bonds in glucose and other C-6 sugar intermediates, leading to the formation of ethylene glycol and propylene glycol, in competition with the sugar hydrogenation to the corresponding C-6 polyols (e.g. sorbitol) on Ru/C. The basic C support, behaving similar to other solid bases (i.e. MgO), catalyzes the isomerization of glucose into fructose, leading to the favored formation of propylene glycol instead of ethylene glycol. Such strong dependence of the product distribution on the catalytic functions is clarified by the kinetic analysis of the three competitive reactions of glucose, including its hydrogenation, isomerization and C-C bond cleavage. Importantly, such kinetic analysis can predict the maximum selectivity ratio of propylene glycol to ethylene glycol, which is 2.5, for example, at 478 K under the reaction conditions in this work, corresponding to a maximum yield of propylene glycol of similar to 71%. These understandings shed new insights into the selective conversion of cellulose, which provides guidance for the rational design of catalyst functions and tuning of reaction parameters towards the controllable synthesis of specific products from cellulose. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据