4.5 Article

Fish-like aquatic propulsion studied using a pneumatically-actuated soft-robotic model

期刊

BIOINSPIRATION & BIOMIMETICS
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1748-3190/ab8d0f

关键词

soft robotics; fish locomotion; model; active swimming

资金

  1. Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology at Harvard University
  2. Ashford Foundation
  3. Office of Naval Research [ONR 341, N00014-15-1-2234]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation [P2SKP3_158677]
  5. Cyber Valley Research Fund [CyVy-RF-2019-08]
  6. Max Planck Society
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [P2SKP3_158677] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fish locomotion is characterized by waves of muscle electrical activity that proceed from head to tail, and result in an undulatory pattern of body bending that generates thrust during locomotion. Isolating the effects of parameters like body stiffness, co-activation between the right and left sides of the body, and frequency on thrust generation has proven to be difficult in live fishes. We use a pneumatically-actuated fish-like model to investigate how these parameters affect locomotor force generation. We measure thrust as well as side forces and torques generated during propulsion. Using a statistical linear model we examine the effects of input parameter combinations on thrust generation. We show that both stiffness and frequency substantially affect swimming kinematics, and that there are complex interactive effects of these two parameters on thrust. The stiffer the backbone the more impact that increasing frequency has on thrust production. For stiffer models, increasing frequency resulted in higher values for both thrust and lateral forces. Large side forces reduce swimming efficiency but this effect could be mitigated by decreasing undulatory wavelength and allowing appropriate phasing of left and right body movements to reduce amplitudes of side force.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据