4.6 Review

Caspase-8: The double-edged sword

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188357

关键词

-

资金

  1. Adolf Messer Stiftung
  2. Research Support Foundation Vaduz
  3. Deutsche Krebshilfe
  4. DFG
  5. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg
  6. Verein zur Forderung der Wissenschaft, Pravention and Therapie von Kehlkopfkrebs e.V.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Caspase-8 is a cysteine - aspartate specific protease that classically triggers the extrinsic apoptotic pathway, in response to the activation of cell surface Death Receptors (DRs) like FAS, TRAIL-R and TNF-R. Besides it's roles in triggering death receptor-mediated apoptosis, Caspase-8 has also been implicated in the onsets of anoikis, autophagy and pyroptosis. Furthermore, Caspase-8 also plays a crucial pro-survival function by inhibiting an alternative form of programmed cell death called necroptosis. Low expression levels of pro-Caspase-8 is therefore associated with the malignant transformation of cancers. However, the long-held notion that pro-Caspase-8 expression/activity is generally lost in most cancers, thereby contributing to apoptotic escape and enhanced resistance to anti-cancer therapeutics, has been found to be true for only a minority of cancers types. In the majority of cases, pro-Caspase-8 expression is maintained and sometimes elevated, while it's apoptotic activity is regulated through different mechanisms. This supports the notion that the non-apoptotic functions of Caspase-8 offer growth advantage in these cancer types and have, therefore, gained renewed interest in the recent years. In light of these reasons, a number of therapeutic approaches have been employed, with the intent of targeting pro-Caspase-8 in cancer cells. In this review, we would attempt to discuss - the classic roles of Caspase-8 in initiating apoptosis; it's non-apoptotic functions; it's the clinical significance in different cancer types; and the therapeutic applications exploiting the ability of pro-Caspase-8 to regulate various cellular functions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据