4.5 Article

Hydrogenation of Levulinic Acid into γ-Valerolactone Over Ruthenium Catalysts Supported on Metal-Organic Frameworks in Aqueous Medium

期刊

CATALYSIS LETTERS
卷 146, 期 10, 页码 2041-2052

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10562-016-1819-1

关键词

Biomass; Heterogeneous catalysis; Hydrogenation; Metal-organic frameworks; gamma-Valerolactone

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21472189]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB215304]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [2015A030312007]
  4. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China [2015A010106010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liquid-phase hydrogenation of levulinic acid (LA) to gamma-valerolactone (GVL) was investigated over Metal-Organic Framework- and zeolite-supported ruthenium catalysts in aqueous media at low reaction temperature. Ru/MIL-101(Cr) showed the highest activities over Ru/MIL-100(Cr) and the investigated Ru/zeolite catalysts in terms of both turn over frequencies (TOFs) for LA-to-GVL transformation and GVL formation rate. The catalytic activity of Ru/MIL-100(Cr) was comparable to Ru/HY-zeolite (Si/Al aeyen 5.2). The Ru/MIL-101(Cr) provided a combination of both high acidity of MIL-101(Cr) support and high dispensability of metallic sites, which promotes LA hydrogenation to 4-hydroxypentanoic acid and subsequent esterification of 4-hydroxypentanoic acid to GVL via a simultaneous access of LA into the both sites. Under the investigated mild reaction conditions, both GVL selectivity and yield exceeding 99 % with a full conversion of LA were obtained by using Ru/MIL-101(Cr) catalyst at a reaction temperature of 70A degrees C after 5 h under H-2 pressure of 1.0 MPa. Moreover, Ru/MIL-101(Cr) can be easily reused at least for four times. Ruthenium immobilized on Metal-Organic Frameworks is efficiently used as recyclable catalyst for levulinic acid hydrogenation to biomass-based gamma-valerolactone. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据