4.6 Article

Li-rich K giants, dust excess, and binarity

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 639, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037585

关键词

binaries: general; stars: evolution; stars: late-type

资金

  1. Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), Belgium
  2. Research Council of KU Leuven, Belgium
  3. Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (F.R.S.-FNRS), Belgium
  4. Royal Observatory of Belgium
  5. Observatoire de Geneve, Switzerland
  6. Thuringer Landessternwarte Tautenburg, Germany
  7. Belgian Science Policy Office [BR/143/A2/STARLAB]
  8. F.W.O. [ZKD1501-00-W01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The origin of the Li-rich K giants is still highly debated. Here, we investigate the incidence of binarity among this family from a nine-year radial-velocity monitoring of a sample of 11 Li-rich K giants using the HERMES spectrograph attached to the 1.2 m Mercator Telescope. A sample of 13 non-Li-rich giants (8 of them being surrounded by dust according to IRAS, WISE, and ISO data) was monitored alongside. When compared to the binary frequency in a reference sample of 190 K giants (containing 17.4% of definite spectroscopic binaries - SB - and 6.3% of possible spectroscopic binaries - SB?), the binary frequency appears normal among the Li-rich giants (2/11 definite binaries plus 2 possible binaries, or 18.2% SB + 18.2% SB?), after taking account of the small sample size through the hypergeometric probability distribution. Therefore, there appears to be no causal relationship between Li enrichment and binarity. Moreover, there is no correlation between Li enrichment and the presence of circumstellar dust, and the only correlation that could be found between Li enrichment and rapid rotation is that the most Li-enriched K giants appear to be fast-rotating stars. However, among the dusty K giants, the binary frequency is much higher (4/8 definite binaries plus 1 possible binary). The remaining 3 dusty K giants suffer from a radial-velocity jitter, as is expected for the most luminous K giants, which these are.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据