4.7 Article

Seagrass meadows improve inflowing water quality in aquaculture ponds

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 528, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735502

关键词

Water quality; Water purification; Seagrass; Biological control; Nature-based solutions

资金

  1. Foundation of Science and Technology of Portugal [PTDC/MAR-EST/3223/2014, UIDB/04326/2020, SFRH/BPD/119344/2016, SFRH/BD/118601/2016]
  2. MAR2020 through project DIVERSIAQUA [MAR202016-02-01-FMP-0066]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/119344/2016, PTDC/MAR-EST/3223/2014, SFRH/BD/118601/2016] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water quality is critical for fish health in aquaculture production. In flow-through systems, the inflowing water normally requires quality controls and treatments for being supplied from coastal water bodies that can be polluted by nutrients, suspended solids, and microorganisms. Here we assess how seagrass meadows benefit aquaculture systems through the provision of ecosystem services (water filtration, biological control, and regulation of dissolved gasses) in the water reservoir that supplies earthen ponds in an aquaculture system in southern Portugal. In the 1.45-ha reservoir, seagrasses retained daily an estimate of 0.8-1.8 kg d(-1) of nitrogen, 0.04-0.07 kg d(-1) of phosphorus in their biomass, and 0.7-1.1 kg dw d(-1) of suspended total particulate matter, bringing benefits in terms of nutrient and particle removal from the water column. Diel and spatial variation in faecal coliforms levels (Escherichia coli) in the reservoir suggested that seagrasses, in combination with light exposure, may reduce the levels of this pathogen. Furthermore, the seagrass-dominated system oxygenated the water through photosynthesis at a faster rate than the respiratory oxygen consumption, maintaining the system above the aquaculture minimum oxygen. This study demonstrates that seagrasses can be used as a nature-based solution to overcome water quality challenges in flow-through aquaculture ponds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据