4.6 Article

Co-culturing Chlorella minutissima with Escherichia coli can increase neutral lipid production and improve biodiesel quality

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
卷 112, 期 9, 页码 1801-1809

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.25609

关键词

co-culture; Chlorella; lipid; fatty acid; nitrogen limitation; carbon dioxide

资金

  1. NSF [DGE-0948021, MCB-1139644]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1139644] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1438211] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lipid productivity and fatty acid composition are important metrics for the production of high quality biodiesel from algae. Our previous results showed that co-culturing the green alga Chlorella minutissima with Escherichia coli under high-substrate mixotrophic conditions enhanced both culture growth and crude lipid content. To investigate further, we analyzed neutral lipid content and fatty acid content and composition of axenic cultures and co-cultures produced under autotrophic and mixotrophic conditions. We found that co-culturing C. minutissima with E. coli under high substrate conditions (10g/L) increased neutral lipid content 1.9- to 3.1-fold and fatty acid content 1.5- to 2.6-fold compared to equivalent axenic C. minutissima cultures. These same co-cultures also exhibited a significant fatty acid shift away from trienoic and toward monoenoic fatty acids thereby improving the quality of the synthesized fatty acids for biodiesel production. Further investigation suggested that E. coli facilitates substrate uptake by the algae and that the resulting growth enhancement induces a nitrogen-limited condition. Enhanced carbon uptake coupled with nitrogen limitation is the likely cause of the observed neutral lipid accumulation and fatty acid profile changes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2015;112: 1801-1809. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据