4.7 Article

An experimental investigation to determine the optimal heat source temperature for R141b ejector operation in refrigeration cycle

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 170, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114841

关键词

Ejector performance; Ejector refrigeration cycle; Low temperature heat source; HCFC-141b

资金

  1. King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok [KMUTNB-62-NEW-09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper provides an experimental investigation of an R141b ejector refrigeration system which concentrates on the effect of the driving generator temperature on the ejector performance under various working conditions. The experimental ejector refrigerator working with R141b was designed and built for investigation. The generator temperature was varied to determine the optimal generator temperature. The working generator temperature was varied between 80 and 105 degrees C. The evaporator temperature was ranged from 6 to 14 degrees C. Three primary nozzles were used to investigate the effect of the ejector area ratio to the optimal performance. The condenser saturation temperature was ranged from 28 to 34 degrees C. It was found that the optimal generator temperature varied with the change in the working conditions and primary nozzle used. With variation in the evaporator temperature, the upstream pressure ratio was initially introduced and its impact on the optimal operation was later discussed. This upstream pressure ratio strongly influenced the optimal operation at relatively high evaporator temperature, and hence, the proper value was determined for this present work. In addition, the proper ejector area ratio for working condition consistent with this present work was determined. The results also demonstrated the feasibility of using an ejector refrigerator with a relatively low generator temperature while rejecting unwanted heat at relatively high condensation temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据