4.7 Article

Development and production of nanobodies specifically against green fluorescence protein

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 104, 期 11, 页码 4837-4848

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-020-10535-w

关键词

GFP nanobody; Phage display; VHH

资金

  1. Research Start-up Fund for Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital Introduced Talent [YY2018-006] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Fund from Guangzhou Institute of Pediatrics, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center [YIP-2019-031] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Variable domains of heavy chains of camelid heavy-chain antibodies (VHHs) are known as nanobodies. Nanobodies are approximately 15 kDa in size with high affinity to their antigens. They can be easily manipulated and produced in microorganisms. In this study, an alpaca was immunized with purified green fluorescence protein (GFP) and a VHH library from lymphocytes of the immunized alpaca was constructed with a capacity of 6.7 x 10(7). The library was biopanned against GFP by phage display technique and four unique DNA sequences coding for anti-GFP nanobodies were identified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, named a12, e6, d5, and b9. The four DNA sequences were then cloned into pADL-10b-6xHis or pBAD24-Flag-6xHis for expression in bacteria. Purified A12, E6, D5, and B9 were demonstrated to bind GFP specifically both in vitro by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and native-PAGE analysis and in vivo by immunofluorescence and immunoprecipitation. Taken together, our results demonstrate that anti-GFP nanobodies are successfully selected from the immune library, are produced in bacteria, and are available for basic research. Key Points center dot Four different GFP binders were successfully obtained from an immune VHH library. center dot The four GFP binders were successfully purified from bacteria. center dot Purified GFP binders can bind GFP both in vitro and in vivo and are ready for use in basic research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据