4.6 Article

Is Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Withdrawal a Safe Option After Double-Lung Transplantation?

期刊

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
卷 110, 期 4, 页码 1167-1174

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.03.077

关键词

-

资金

  1. Foch Lung Transplant Group

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is commonly used during double-lung transplantation. ECMO can be planned or unplanned, and used only during the procedure or extended post-operatively (intraoperative or extended). Our practice is to limit its use and duration as much as possible. We conducted this retrospective single-center study to assess prognoses of patients undergoing unplanned-intraoperative ECMO. Methods. From among 436 patients who underwent double-lung transplantation from 2012 to 2018, we excluded those who underwent bridge-to-transplantation, multiorgan transplantation, repeated transplantation during the study period, and cardiopulmonary bypass. Unplanned-intraoperative ECMO group was compared with no-ECMO and planned-intraoperative ECMO groups. Results. In our sample, 209 patients did not require ECMO, 77 underwent unplanned-intraoperative ECMO, and 14 underwent planned-intraoperative ECMO. One-year and 3-year survival were lower in unplanned-intraoperative ECMO group than in the no-ECMO group (P = .043 and P = .032, respectively). The only independent protective factor related to 1-year mortality was history of cystic fibrosis (P = .013). Lung allocation score (P = .001), grade 3 pulmonary graft dysfunction at end-surgery status (P = .014), and estimated intraoperative blood loss (P = .031) were risk factors. Conclusions. Patients who underwent unplanned-intraoperative ECMO showed poorer prognoses than patients who did not require ECMO. This finding may be explained by differences in initial condition severity, by long-term consequences of the intraoperative complications leading to ECMO pump implantation, or by flaws in our weaning protocol. (C) 2020 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据