4.6 Article

A stochastic disaster-resilient and sustainable reverse logistics model in big data environment

期刊

ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-020-03573-0

关键词

Reverse logistics; Mixed-integer linear program (MILP); Uncertain demand and returns; Carbon cap and trade; Resilience

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, New Delhi, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a mixed-integer linear programming model is discussed to provide joint decision making for facility location and production-distribution across countries for both forward and reverse logistics. A hybrid facility network is considered for cost-cutting and equipment sharing where the facilities of forward logistics are also equipped to provide reverse logistics services. The model considers the dynamic production and storage capacity of the facilities which can be expanded if required. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the model is tested to deal with disruptions due to man-made or natural disasters. The dynamic facility allocation enables the model to withstand the demand/supply disruptions in a disaster-affected zone. Besides this, the model considers carbon emissions caused due to manufacturing, remanufacturing, repair, storage and transportation. These emissions are regulated using cap and trade policy Thus, the proposed model balances resilience and sustainability under uncertain market demand and product returns. The chance-constrained approach is used to obtain the deterministic equivalence of the stochastic demand and returns. The paper also investigates the changes in emission and production level in each country under demand and supply disruptions. The parameters of the model are mapped with the various dimensions of big data such as volume, velocity and variety. The proposed model is solved using randomly generated data sets having realistic parameters with essential big data characteristics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据