4.5 Article

How do social status and tree architecture influence radial growth, wood density and drought response in spontaneously established oak forests?

期刊

ANNALS OF FOREST SCIENCE
卷 77, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER FRANCE
DOI: 10.1007/s13595-020-00949-x

关键词

Dominant trees; Forest expansion; Pointer years; Quercus robur L; Single; and multi-stemmed trees; Wood density

类别

资金

  1. project NEWFORLAND - Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness [RTI2018-099397-C22]
  2. BiodivERsA project SPONFOREST [BiodivERsA3-2015-58]
  3. postdoctoral grant Juan de la Cierva-Formacion [FJCI-2015-26848]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Key message During the past decades, a multitude of oak stands have spontaneously established across the pine-dominated landscapes of the French Landes de Gascogne. Yet their future performance under modern climate change is unknown. We show that coppiced, dominant trees are most prepared to cope with drought episodes, displaying higher basal area increment and lower sensitivity to extreme events. Context Forest stands dominated by pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) have spontaneously established across the pine-dominated landscapes of the French Landes de Gascogne. These oak stands are typically unmanaged and unsystematically coppiced, resulting in mixtures of single- and multi-stemmed (coppiced) trees. Aims To determine the ability of spontaneous oak forest stands to face climate change-related hazards, by analysing differences in growth (tree-ring width and basal area increment-BAI), wood density and climate sensitivity depending on their tree architecture (single- vs multi-stemmed trees) and their social status in the forest. Methods We exhaustively cored 15 oak stands (n = 657 trees). We compared stand characteristics and climate sensitivity between tree architectures considering two sampling designs, either all sampled trees (the exhaustive sampling) or those with a dominant status (dominant sampling). At the tree level, we used linear mixed effects models to compare wood density and growth between tree architectures and the trees' social status within the canopy layer (dominant- vs non-dominant trees). Results Multi-stemmed trees exhibited higher wood density than single-stemmed trees for diameters > 30 cm. Dominant multi-stemmed trees showed lower sensitivity to extreme events (pointer years), higher BAI but lower annual growth rates than dominant single-stemmed trees. Conclusion Dominant multi-stemmed trees are potentially the most prepared ones to cope with increasing soil water deficit following drought episodes, at least during the first 60 years of the life of the tree. The vulnerability to face harsher climate conditions for Q. robur stands can be misled when using a dominant sampling design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据