4.8 Article

Direct Electrochemical Ammonia Synthesis from Nitric Oxide

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 59, 期 24, 页码 9711-9718

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202002337

关键词

ammonia synthesis; computational catalyst design; electrocatalysis; NO removal

资金

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Grant [2019M661140] Funding Source: Medline
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91845103, 21802124, 21988101, 91945302, 21890753] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA21010208] Funding Source: Medline
  4. DNL Cooperation Fund, CAS [No. DNL180201, DNL180201] Funding Source: Medline
  5. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFA0204100, 2016YFA0200200] Funding Source: Medline
  6. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDB-SSW-JSC020] Funding Source: Medline
  7. LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program [XLYC1907099] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NO removal from exhausted gas is necessary owing to its damage to environment. Meanwhile, the electrochemical ammonia synthesis (EAS) from N(2)suffers from low reaction rate and Faradaic efficiency (FE). Now, an alternative route for ammonia synthesis is proposed from exhaust NO via electrocatalysis. DFT calculations indicate electrochemical NO reduction (NORR) is more active than N(2)reduction (NRR). Via a descriptor-based approach, Cu was screened out to be the most active transition metal catalyst for NORR to NH(3)owing to its moderate reactivity. Kinetic barrier calculations reveal NH(3)is the most preferred product relative to H-2, N2O, and N(2)on Cu. Experimentally, a record-high EAS rate of 517.1 mu mol cm(-2) h(-1)and FE of 93.5 % were achieved at -0.9 V vs. RHE using a Cu foam electrode, exhibiting stable electrocatalytic performances with a 100 h run. This work provides an alternative strategy to EAS from exhaust NO, coupled with NO removal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据