4.8 Article

Construction of a Quencher-Free Cascade Amplification System for Highly Specific and Sensitive Detection of Serum Circulating miRNAs

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 92, 期 12, 页码 8546-8552

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c01385

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21735003, 21527811, 21705097]
  2. Award for Team Leader Program of Taishan Scholars of Shandong Province, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Circulating miRNAs are a newly emerging class of noninvasive biomarkers, and the accurate quantification of their expression is essential to the biological research and early clinic diagnosis. Herein, we demonstrate the construction of a quencher-free cascade amplification system for highly sensitive detection of serum circulating miRNAs. The target miRNA can hybridize with the linear probe to induce the cyclic strand displacement amplification (SDA) (cycle I) for the production of the binding probes. The binding probe can subsequently react with the 2-aminopurine (2-AP)-hairpin probe to induce the recycling exonuclease cleavage of 2-AP-hairpin probes (cycle II), releasing the triggers and 2-AP molecules simultaneously. The released trigger can hybridize with the free linear probe to start new cycles I and II amplifications. Through multiple rounds of cascade amplifications, a large number of 2-AP molecules are released, generating an enhanced fluorescence signal. This method exhibits a large dynamic range of 8 orders of magnitude and a detection limit of 0.16 aM. It can differentiate a single-base mismatch in miR-486-Sp, quantify miR-486-Sp in lung cancer cells at various stages, and even discriminate the expressions of serum circulating miR-486-Sp in healthy persons from that in nonsmall-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients. Moreover, this assay can be rapidly carried out in one step under isothermal condition in a label-free manner, holding promising applications in point-of-care diagnosis and prognosis of lung cancers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据