4.7 Article

In silico maturation of affinity and selectivity of DNA aptamers against aflatoxin B1 for biosensor development

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 1105, 期 -, 页码 178-186

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2020.01.045

关键词

Aflatoxin B-1; Aptamer; Molecular docking; Fluorescent anisotropy; Genetic algorithm; Gold nanoparticles

资金

  1. Department of Plant Protection, College of Agricultural Sciences & Engineering, University of Tehran (Karaj, Iran)
  2. Department of Chemistry, University of Turin Via Giuria (Turin, Italy)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A high affinity and selectivity DNA aptamer for aflatoxin B-1 (AFB(1)) was designed through Genetic Algorithm (GA) based in silico maturation (ISM) strategy. The sequence of a known AFB(1) aptamer (Patent: PCT/CA2010/001292, Apt1) applied as a probe in many aptasensors was modified using seven GA rounds to generate an initial library and three different generations of ss DNA oligonucleotides as new candidate aptamers. Molecular docking methodology was used to screen and analyze the best aptamere-AFB(1) complexes. Also, a new pipeline was proposed to faithfully predict the tertiary structure of all single stranded DNA sequences. By the second generation, aptamer Apt1 sequence was optimized in the local search space and five aptamers including F20, g12, C52, C32 and H1 were identified as the best aptamers for AFB(1). The selected aptamers were applied as probes in an unmodified gold nanoparticles-based aptasensor to evaluate their binding affinity to AFB(1) and their selectivity against other mycotoxins (aflatoxins B-2, G(1), G(2), M-1, ochratoxin A and zearalenone). In addition, a novel direct fluorescent anisotropy aptamer assay was developed to confirm the binding interaction of the selected aptamers over AFB(1). The ISM allowed the identification of an aptamer, F20, with up to 9.4 and 2 fold improvement in affinity and selectivity compared to the parent aptamer, respectively. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据