4.6 Article

Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Patients with Convalescent Plasma

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 190, 期 8, 页码 1680-1690

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2020.05.014

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [AI146771-01, AI139369-01]
  2. Fondren Foundation, Houston Methodist Hospital and Research Institute
  3. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases/NIH [75N93019C00050]
  4. Army Research Office [W911NF-12-1-0390]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, has spread globally, and no proven treatments are available. Convalescent plasma therapy has been used with varying degrees of success to treat severe microbial infections for >100 years. Patients (n = 25) with severe and/or life-threatening COVID-19 disease were enrolled at the Houston Methodist hospitals from March 28, 2020, to April 14, 2020. Patients were transfused with convalescent plasma, obtained from donors with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection who had recovered. The primary study outcome was safety, and the secondary outcome was clinical status at day 14 after transfusion. Clinical improvement was assessed on the basis of a modified World Health Organization six-point ordinal scale and laboratory parameters. Viral genome sequencing was performed on donor and recipient strains. At day 7 after transfusion with convalescent plasma, nine patients had at least a one-point improvement in clinical scale, and seven of those were discharged. By day 14 after transfusion, 19 (76%) patients had at least a one-point improvement in clinical status, and 11 were discharged. No adverse events as a result of plasma transfusion were observed. Whole genome sequencing data did not identify a strain genotype-disease severity correlation. The data indicate that administration of convalescent plasma is a safe treatment option for those with severe COVID-19 disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据