Distinctive Mechanisms and Patterns of Exudative Versus Tractional Intraretinal Cystoid Spaces as Seen With Multimodal Imaging

PURPOSE: To determine clear-cut distinctions between tractional and exudative intraretinal cystoid spaces subtypes. DESIGN: Retrospective, multicenter, observational case series. METHODS: A cohort of patients diagnosed with intraretinal cystoid spaces and imaged with optical coherence tomography (OCT), fluorescein angiography (FA), blue fundus autofluorescence (BFAF), en face OCT, and OCT angiography (OCT-A) was included in the study. All images were qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated. RESULTS: In this study were included 72 eyes of 69 patients. Exudative intraretinal cystoid spaces (36/72 eyes, 50%) displayed a petaloid morphology as seen with en face OCT, FA, and BFAF. Tractional intraretinal cystoid spaces (24/72 eyes, 33.3%), displayed a radial spokewheel en face OCT pattern. There was no leakage with FA and BFAF did not reveal specific patterns. Eyes with full-thickness macular hole (FTMH, 12/72 eyes, 16.7%) displayed a sunflower en face OCT appearance. FTMH showed OCT, OCT-A, and BFAF features of both exudative and tractional cystoid spaces, but without any FA leakage. Inner nuclear layer (INL) thickness was significantly lower in tractional cystoid spaces (P < .001). There were a greater number of INL cystoid spaces in both the exudative and FTMH subgroups (P = .001). The surface area of INL cystoid spaces was significantly lower in the tractional subgroup (P < .001). There was a significant reduction of the microvascular density in eyes with exudative vs tractional (P = .002) and FTMH (P < .001) subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Exudative and tractional intraretinal cystoid spaces displayed characteristic multimodal imaging features and they may represent 2 different pathologic conditions with equally different clinical implications. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.