4.6 Article

Comparison of Rate of Change between Bruch's Membrane Opening Minimum Rim Width and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer in Eyes Showing Optic Disc Hemorrhage

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 217, 期 -, 页码 27-37

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.03.051

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the longitudinal rate of change of Bruch's membrane opening minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in eyes showing optic disc hemorrhage (DH). DESIGN: Observational case series. METHODS: A total of 82 subjects(82 eyes) showing DH who had undergone more than five reliable spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) tests were included. BMO-MRW and RNFL were measured with OCT at 3-month intervals. The rates of change in global and each Garway-Heath sector were calculated with a linear mixed-effects model after adjusting for age, sex, and BMO area. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 21.57 +/- 7.88 months with a mean number of 7.88 +/- 2.39 OCT tests. Baseline demographics were age (58.37 +/- 10.65 y); 46.3% were female; and the mean deviation was -4.41 +/- 5.04 dB. The global rate of change in BMO- MRW was -3.507 +/- 0.675 mu m/y and in -1.404 +/- 0.208 mu m/y in RNFL. The rate of change was the greatest in the inferotemporal sector, which was -9.141 +/- 1.254 mu m/y in BMO-MRW and -4.204 +/- 0.490 mu m/y in the RNFL. The rate of change was significantly greater in BMO-MRW than in the RNFL in all sectors, except for the nasal sector (P < .05). Percentage of reduction was significantly greater in BMO-MRW than in RNFL in the inferotemporal and superotemporal sectors (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: BMO-MRW showed a significantly greater rate of change than RNFL in eyes showing DH, especially in the inferotemporal and superotemporal sectors in percentage of reduction. Thus, it may be more advantageous to detect glaucomatous progression earlier in BMO-MRW than in the RNFL in eyes showing DH that are more likely to progress. ((C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据