4.2 Article

Brain morphological analysis in PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
卷 182, 期 5, 页码 1117-1129

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61532

关键词

HARDI; mega corpus callosum; megalencephaly; PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome; structural brain MRI

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD078561] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R21 MH118739] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [R03 NS101372] Funding Source: Medline
  4. CSR NIH HHS [R03NS101372, R21MH118739, R01HD078561] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome (PHTS) is a spectrum of hereditary cancer syndromes caused by germline mutations in PTEN. PHTS is of high interest, because of its high rate of neurological comorbidities including macrocephaly, autism spectrum disorder, and intellectual dysfunction. Since detailed brain morphology and connectivity of PHTS remain unclear, we quantitatively evaluated brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in PHTS. Sixteen structural T1-weighted and 9 diffusion-weighted MR images from 12 PHTS patients and neurotypical controls were used for structural and high-angular resolution diffusion MRI (HARDI) tractography analyses. Mega-corpus callosum was observed in 75%, polymicrogyria in 33%, periventricular white matter lesions in 83%, and heterotopia in 17% of the PHTS participants. While gyrification index and hemispheric cortical thickness showed no significant differences between the two groups, significantly increased global and regional brain volumes, and regionally thicker cortices in PHTS participants were observed. HARDI tractography showed increased volume and length of callosal pathways, increased volume of the arcuate fasciculi (AF), and increased length of the bilateral inferior longitudinal fasciculi (ILF), bilateral inferior fronto-occipital fasciculi (IFOF), and bilateral uncinate fasciculus. A decrease in fractional anisotropy and an increased in apparent diffusion coefficient values of the AF, left ILF, and left IFOF in PHTS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据