4.7 Article

Accurate control of Aerial Manipulators outdoors. A reliable and self-coordinated nonlinear approach

期刊

AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 99, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2020.105731

关键词

Aerial Manipulators; Nonlinear control; Lyapunov stability; Passivity-Based Control; Integral Closed-Loop Inverse Kinematics control

资金

  1. AEROARMS project from European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [644271]
  2. AEROMAIN Spanish MINECO Retos project [DPI2014-59383-C2-1-R]
  3. VPPI of Universidad de Sevilla

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, standard Unmanned Aerial Vehicles have been enhanced in order to execute manipulation tasks, named Aerial Manipulators and composed of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and a Robot Manipulator. These aerial vehicles are extremely demanding on the flight control system, which needs to keep flight stability while autonomously executing complex tasks. This work continues a recent line of research where a nonlinear control strategy is proposed to comply with outdoor high-level demands to achieve enhanced accuracy and safety. This solution combines nonlinear control subsystems with decentralized priorities but coordinating their relative movements to allow the aerial vehicle to accommodate itself while reaching the manipulator target. The complete strategy is composed of: a passive nonlinear dynamic controller for the UAV, an integral kinematic multi-task controller for the manipulator, and an optimizer to coordinate their relative movements. Theoretical stability results are reported, along with implementation-oriented add-ons and an extensive analysis in realistic simulations. These include aerodynamic effects (e.g. unsteady wind disturbances and rotor propulsion models), collision avoidance, grasping and a comparison with a standard strategy on a benchmark mission complex enough for validation. (C) 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据