4.8 Article

Cellulose II Aerogel-Based Triboelectric Nanogenerator

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 28, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202001763

关键词

energy harvesting; human motion monitoring; regenerated cellulose; self-powered sensors; triboelectric nanogenerators

资金

  1. Hightower Chair foundation of the Georgia Institute of Technology
  2. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2018RZ0074]
  3. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) McIntire Stennis project [WIS01996]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cellulose-based triboelectric nanogenerators (TENGs) have gained increasing attention. In this study, a novel method is demonstrated to synthesize cellulose-based aerogels and such aerogels are used to fabricate TENGs that can serve as mechanical energy harvesters and self-powered sensors. The cellulose II aerogel is fabricated via a dissolution-regeneration process in a green inorganic molten salt hydrate solvent (lithium bromide trihydrate), where. The as-fabricated cellulose II aerogel exhibits an interconnected open-pore 3D network structure, higher degree of flexibility, high porosity, and a high surface area of 221.3 m(2) g(-1). Given its architectural merits, the cellulose II aerogel-based TENG presents an excellent mechanical response sensitivity and high electrical output performance. By blending with other natural polysaccharides, i.e., chitosan and alginic acid, electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups are introduced into the composite cellulose II aerogels, which significantly improves the triboelectric performance of the TENG. The cellulose II aerogel-based TENG is demonstrated to light up light-emitting diodes, charge commercial capacitors, power a calculator, and monitor human motions. This study demonstrates the facile fabrication of cellulose II aerogel and its application in TENG, which leads to a high-performance and eco-friendly energy harvesting and self-powered system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据