4.8 Review

A Review of 3D Printing Technologies for Soft Polymer Materials

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 28, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202000187

关键词

3D printing; bioinspired design; multimaterial printing; polymer materials; soft materials

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFA0703000]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [U1909218, 81827804]
  3. Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51821093]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soft polymer materials, which are similar to human tissues, have played critical roles in modern interdisciplinary research. Compared with conventional methods, 3D printing allows rapid prototyping and mass customization and is ideal for processing soft polymer materials. However, 3D printing of soft polymer materials is still in the early stages of development and is facing many challenges including limited printable materials, low printing resolution and speed, and poor functionalities. The present review aims to summarize the ideas to address these challenges. It focuses on three points: 1) how to develop printable materials and make unprintable materials printable, 2) how to choose suitable methods and improve printing resolution, and 3) how to directly construct functional structures/systems with 3D printing. After a brief introduction on this topic, the mainstream 3D printing technologies for printing soft polymer materials are reviewed, with an emphasis on improving printing resolution and speed, choosing suitable printing techniques, developing printable materials, and printing multiple materials. Moreover, the state-of-the-art advancements in multimaterial 3D printing of soft polymer materials are summarized. Furthermore, the revolutions brought about by 3D printing of soft polymer materials for applications similar to biology are highlighted. Finally, viewpoints and future perspectives for this emerging field are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据