4.6 Article

Loss of FBP1 facilitates aggressive features of hepatocellular carcinoma cells through the Warburg effect

期刊

CARCINOGENESIS
卷 38, 期 2, 页码 134-143

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgw109

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Key Sci-Tech Special Project of China [2012ZX10002011-004]
  2. National Key Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2015CB553905]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81301818, 81402278, 81572311, 81421001]
  4. projects of Special Research Fund for Healthy [201402003]
  5. Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine [YG2014MS44, YG2015QN34]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reprogrammed metabolism has been identified as an emerging hallmark in cancer cells. It has been demonstrated that fructose-1, 6-bisphosphatase 1 (FBP1) as a rate-limiting enzyme in gluconeogenesis plays critical roles in tumor initiation and progression in several cancer types. However, function of FBP1 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still not clear. In this study, we observed that the expression of FBP1 was obviously downregulated in the cell lines and tissues of HCC. Downregulation of FBP1 in HCC tissues was correlated with a lower overall survival rate and had a relatively higher tendency of tumor recurrence (n = 224). Silencing FBP1 could significantly promote colony formation, proliferation and metastasis of HCC cells, while ectopic overexpression of FBP1 resulted in impaired abilities of colony formation, proliferation and metastasis in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, silencing FBP1 facilitated glycolysis in HCC cell lines, which may be responsible for aggressiveness of HCC cells. We further found that targeting the Warburg effect using the specific inhibitor FX11 could suppress the aggressiveness of HCC cells which was mediated by loss of FBP1. These findings indicate that FBP1 appears to be a tumor suppressor in HCC. Strategies to restore the levels and activities of FBP1 might be developed to treat patients with HCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据