4.5 Article

Pain is frequent in children with cerebral palsy and negatively affects physical activity and participation

期刊

ACTA PAEDIATRICA
卷 110, 期 1, 页码 301-306

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apa.15341

关键词

cerebral palsy; children; pain; participation; physical leisure activity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to identify the prevalence of long-lasting pain among children with cerebral palsy and its association with participation in physical leisure activities. Results showed that a significant proportion of children with CP reported pain, which appeared to negatively impact their participation in physical leisure activities.
Aim The aim was to identify the prevalence of long-lasting pain among children with cerebral palsy (CP) and to investigate the association between pain and participation in physical leisure activities. Methods This is a cross-sectional study based on data from the National Danish Clinical Quality Database of children with CP. The study population consisted of 960 children aged 2-11 years across all Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels. Data were collected at children's regular clinical visits in 2016 or 2017. Information about pain and participation in physical leisure activities were obtained. The association was estimated as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) by logistic regression adjusted for age and sex. Results We included data from 817 children (59% boys) median age 6 years, 52% classified as GMFCS level I. A total of 36% reported pain, and the most frequent pain locations were hips, feet and knees. Children reporting pain had lower odds for participation in physical leisure activities (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.96). Conclusion A large proportion of children with CP reported pain. There is an indication that long-lasting pain influences participation in physical leisure activities. Pain-relieving interventions are important to decrease pain-related suffering and facilitate participation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据