4.7 Article

Controlling βSn grain orientations in electronic interconnects with single-crystal Cobalt substrates

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 194, 期 -, 页码 422-436

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.04.059

关键词

Intermetallic; EBSD; Orientation relationship; Interface; Texture

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51804032]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M640076]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reliability of electronic solder joints is strongly influenced by beta Sn grain orientations. Single-crystal Cobalt substrates were used to control beta Sn nucleation and grain orientations in solder joints. On (0001)Co, (11 (2) over bar0) Co, (10 (1) over bar0)Co, and (1 (1) over bar 02 )Co, interfacial alpha CoSn3 crystals that are potent to catalyze beta Sn nucleation exhibited strong textures with 2-5 symmetric orientations featuring reproducible orientation relationships (ORs) with the Co. Preferred ORs and orientation selections of alpha CoSn3 were examined by exploring i) thermodynamic stabilities of interfaces represented by interfacial atomic matches and work of adhesion and interfacial energies calculated based on density functional theory (DFT) and ii) crystal growth kinetics indicated by the angle between (100)CoSn3 and the substrate plane. In sharp contrast to the innumerable grain orientations in joints on commonly used substrates, dramatically reduced orientations are attributed to the strongly textured alpha CoSn3, on which beta Sn grains nucleated by fixed ORs. On (11 (2) over bar0)Co, the total number of orientations including twinned grains were reduced to 20. On (10 (1) over bar0)Co, none of the beta Sn orientations exhibit the c-axis perpendicular to the substrate (i.e. parallel to the electron flow direction), which should reduce fast diffusion paths across the joint and improve the reliability of solder joints. (C) 2020 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据