4.7 Article

Microstructure morphology and concentration modulation of nanocomposite thin-films during simulated physical vapor deposition

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 188, 期 -, 页码 181-191

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.02.011

关键词

Phase-field modeling; Phase separation; Self-assembly; Nanocomposite; Physical vapor deposition; Bicontinuous morphology

资金

  1. Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program at Sandia National Laboratories
  2. U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA0003525]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metallic, nanocomposite, thin-films with intertwined morphologies can be synthesized via physical vapor deposition of two immiscible metals. Understanding the phase-ordering kinetics controlling the way the microstructure develops is crucial to obtaining reliable and enhanced functionalities in these nanostructured thin-films. Here, we study the complex relationship between the vapor-deposition conditions and the resulting self-assembled nanoscale morphologies by using phase-field simulations. Our phase-field model accounts for the deposition of the incident vapor phase of a binary alloy onto a substrate, surface interdiffusion, and the subsequent spinodal decomposition in the resulting elastically inhomogeneous thin-film. We systematically investigated the effects of deposition rate, dissimilar bulk and surface kinetics, phase fraction, and dissimilar elastic response on the resulting microstructure. Four distinct classes of achievable self-assembled microstructure morphologies are observed throughout: lateral, vertical, random, and nanoprecipitate concentration modulations. Through our systematic investigation of competing mechanisms, we provide insights on the complex relationships between alloy species and deposition conditions to obtain specific nanostructured morphologies of binary, nanocomposite, thin-films. (C) 2020 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据