4.8 Article

Reusable and Recyclable Graphene Masks with Outstanding Superhydrophobic and Photothermal Performances

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 6213-6221

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c02250

关键词

COVID-19; superhydrophobic; photothermal; graphene; laser precision manufacturing

资金

  1. Innovation and Technology Commission (ITC) of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR), China
  2. Research Office of Hong Kong Polytechnic University [BBX7, BBX9]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The 2019 coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19) is affecting over 210 countries and territories, and it is spreading mainly by respiratory droplets. The use of disposable surgical masks is common for patients, doctors, and even the general public in highly risky areas. However, the current surgical masks cannot self-sterilize in order to reuse or be recycled for other applications. The resulting high economic and environmental costs are further damaging societies worldwide. Herein, we reported a unique method for functionalizing commercially available surgical masks with outstanding self-cleaning and photothermal properties. A dual-mode laser-induced forward transfer method was developed for depositing few-layer graphene onto low-melting temperature nonwoven masks. Superhydrophobic states were observed on the treated masks' surfaces, which can cause the incoming aqueous droplets to bounce off. Under sunlight illumination, the surface temperature of the functional mask can quickly increase to over 80 degrees C, making the masks reusable after sunlight sterilization. In addition, this graphene-coated mask can be recycled directly for use in solar-driven desalination with outstanding salt-rejection performance for long-term use. These roll-to-roll production-line-compatible masks can provide us with better protection against this severe virus. The environment can also benefit from the direct recycling of these masks, which can be used for desalinating seawater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据