4.8 Article

Size- and Temperature-Dependent Intraband Optical Properties of Heavily n-Doped PbS Colloidal Quantum Dot Solid-State Films

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 7161-7169

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c02033

关键词

quantum dots; intraband; lead sulfide; absorption coefficient; temperature dependence

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [725165]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO)
  3. Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) [TEC2017-88655-R]
  4. Fundacio Privada Cellex
  5. program CERCA
  6. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, through the Severo Ochoa Program for Centres of Excellence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Steady-state access to intraband transitions in colloidal quantum dots (CQDs), via doping, permits exploitation of the electromagnetic spectrum at energies below the band gap. CQD intraband optoelectronics allows envisaging cheap mid- and long-wavelength infrared photodetectors and light-emitting devices, which today employ epitaxial materials. As intraband devices start to emerge, thorough studies of the basic properties of intraband transitions in different CQD materials are needed to guide technological research. In this work, we investigate the size and temperature dependence of the intraband transition in heavily n-doped PbS quantum dot (QD) films. In the studied QD size range (5-8 nm), the intraband energy spans from 209 to 151 meV. We measure the intraband absorption coefficient of heavily doped PbS QD films to be around 2 X 10(4) cm(-1), proving that intraband absorption is as strong as interband absorption. We demonstrate a negative dependence of the intraband energy with temperature, in contrast to the positive dependence of the interband transition. Also opposite to the interband case, the temperature dependence of the intraband energy increases with decreasing size, going from -29 mu eV/K to -49 mu eV/K in the studied size range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据