4.8 Article

The Balance between Actomyosin Contractility and Microtubule Polymerization Regulates Hierarchical Protrusions That Govern Efficient Fibroblast-Collagen Interactions

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 14, 期 7, 页码 7868-7879

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b09941

关键词

cell protrusion; collagen remodeling; cell-matrix early interaction; dendritic morphology; fibrous traction force microscopy

资金

  1. NIH [5-T32-HL07081-38]
  2. NSF Center for Engineering Mechanobiology [CMMI-1548571]
  3. NCI [U01CA202177, U54CA193417, R01CA232256]
  4. NIBIB [R01EB017753]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fibroblasts undergo a critical transformation from an initially inactive state to a morphologically different and contractile state after several hours of being embedded within a physiologically relevant three-dimensional (3D) fibrous collagen-based extracellular matrix (ECM). However, little is known about the critical mechanisms by which fibroblasts adapt themselves and their microenvironment in the earliest stage of cell-matrix interaction. Here, we identified the mechanisms by which fibroblasts interact with their 3D collagen fibrous matrices in the early stages of cell-matrix interaction and showed that fibroblasts use energetically efficient hierarchical micro/nanoscaled protrusions in these stages as the primary means for the transformation and adaptation. We found that actomyosin contractility in these protrusions in the early stages of cell-matrix interaction restricts the growth of microtubules by applying compressive forces on them. Our results show that actomyosin contractility and microtubules work in concert in the early stages of cell-matrix interaction to adapt fibroblasts and their microenvironment to one another. These early stage interactions result in responses to disruption of the microtubule network and/or actomyosin contractility that are opposite to well-known responses to late-stage disruption and reveal insight into the ways that cells adapt themselves and their ECM recursively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据