4.6 Article

A New Docking Domain Type in the Peptide-Antimicrobial-Xenorhabdus Peptide Producing Nonribosomal Peptide Synthetase from Xenorhabdus bovienii

期刊

ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 982-989

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.9b01022

关键词

-

资金

  1. LOEWE program (LandesOffensive zur Entwicklung wissenschaftlich-okonomischer Exzellenz) of the state of Hesse
  2. state of Hesse

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs) produce a wide variety of different natural products from amino acid precursors. In contrast to single protein NRPS, the NRPS of the bacterium Xenorhabdus bovienii producing the peptide-antimicrobial-Xenorhabdus (PAX) peptide consists of three individual proteins (PaxA/B/C), which interact with each other noncovalently in a linear fashion. The specific interactions between the three different proteins in this NRPS system are mediated by short C- and N-terminal docking domains ((C/N)DDs). Here, we investigate the structural basis for the specific interaction between the C DD from the protein PaxB and the (DD)-D-N from PaxC. The isolated DD peptides feature transient alpha-helical conformations in the absence of the respective DD partner. Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) titration experiments showed that the two isolated DDs bind to each other and form a structurally well-defined complex with a dissociation constant in the micromolar range as is typical for many DD interactions. Artificial linking of this DD pair via a flexible glycine-serine (GS) linker enabled us to solve the structure of the DD complex by NMR spectroscopy. In the complex, the two DDs interact with each other by forming a three helix bundle arranged in an overall coiled-coil motif. Key interacting residues were identified in mutagenesis experiments. Overall, our structure of the PaxB (DD)-D-C/PaxC (DD)-D-N complex represents an architecturally new type of DD interaction motif.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据