4.8 Article

Cellulose Nanofiber-Reinforced Ionic Conductors for Multifunctional Sensors and Devices

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 12, 期 24, 页码 27545-27554

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c04907

关键词

bacterial cellulose; ionic conductor; deep eutectic solvents; multiple sensor; electroluminescent

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21774036]
  2. Guangdong Province Science Foundation [2017B090903003, 2017GC010429]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ionic conductors are normally prepared from water-based materials in the solid form and feature a combination of intrinsic transparency and stretchability. The sensitivity toward humidity inevitably leads to dehydration or deliquescence issues, which will limit the long-term use of ionic conductors. Here, a novel ionic conductor based on natural bacterial cellulose (BC) and polymerizable deep eutectic solvents (PDESs) is developed for addressing the abovementioned drawbacks. The superstrong three-dimensional nanofiber network and strong interfacial interaction endow the BC-PDES ionic conductor with significantly enhanced mechanical properties (tensile strength of 8 X 10(5) Pa and compressive strength of 6.68 x 10(6) Pa). Furthermore, compared to deliquescent PDESs, BC-PDES composites showed obvious mechanical stability, which maintain good mechanical properties even when exposed to high humidity for 120 days. These materials were demonstrated to possess multiple sensitivity to external stimulus, such as strain, pressure, bend, and temperature. Thus, they can easily serve as supersensitive sensors to recognize physical activity of humans such as limb movements, throat vibrations, and handwriting. Moreover, the BC-PDES ionic conductors can be used in flexible, patterned electroluminescent devices. This work provides an efficient strategy for making cellulose-based sustainable and functional ionic conductors which have broad application in artificial flexible electronics and other products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据