4.8 Article

High-Efficiency Lithium Metal Anode Enabled by a Concentrated/ Fluorinated Ester Electrolyte

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 12, 期 24, 页码 27794-27802

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c06930

关键词

lithium metal anode; solid electrolyte interphase; electrolyte optimization; fluorinated solvent; concentrated electrolyte

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21935009, 21761132030]
  2. Ningde city and Xiamen University [2017C002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium (Li) metal anode (LMA) has received growing attention due to its highest theoretical capacity (3860 mA h g(-1)) and lowest redox potential (-3.04 V versus standard hydrogen electrode). However, practical application of LMA is obstructed by the detrimental side reactions between Li metal and organic electrolytes, especially when cycled in traditional carbonate ester electrolytes. Herein, we propose a novel fluorinated carbonate ester-based electrolyte by combining diethyl fluorocarbonate (ETFEC) solvent and 5 M LiFSI concentration (M = mol L-1). Using this electrolyte, an ultrahigh Li plating/stripping Coulombic efficiency (CE) of 99.1% can be obtained in Li parallel to Cu cells and a stable cycle performance of Li parallel to LiFePO4 is achieved under the conditions of limited Li metal (5 mA h cm(-2)), moderate loading LiFePO4 (7-8 mg cm(-2)), and lean electrolyte (40 uL). The fundamental functioning mechanism of this novel electrolyte has been carefully investigated by scanning electronic microscopy (SEM), operando optical microscopy (OM), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and solid state nuclear magnetic resonance (SS-NMR). The results demonstrate that this optimized electrolyte facilitates formation of a high Li+ conductive SEI layer enriched with LiF and inorganic sulfur-containing species, which can effectively suppress the side reactions between electrolyte and Li metal and prevent formation of dead Li.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据