4.8 Article

Tissue-Adhesive Paint of Silk Microparticles for Articular Surface Cartilage Regeneration

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 12, 期 20, 页码 22467-22478

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c01776

关键词

tissue-adhesive paint; silk fibroin microparticles; partial-thickness cartilage defect; osteoarthritis; cartilage regeneration

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0104900]
  2. NSFC [31830029, 81630065, 81672162]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Current biomaterials and tissue engineering techniques have shown a promising efficacy on full-thickness articular cartilage defect repair in clinical practice. However, due to the difficulty of implanting biomaterials or tissue engineering constructs into a partial-thickness cartilage defect, it remains a challenge to provide a satisfactory cure in joint surface regeneration in the early and middle stages of osteoarthritis. In this study, we focused on a ready-to-use tissue-adhesive joint surface paint (JS-Paint) capable of promoting and enhancing articular surface cartilage regeneration. The JS-Paint is mainly composed of N-(2-aminoethyl)-4-(4-(hydroxymethyl)-2-methoxy-5-nitrosophenoxy) butanamide (NB)-coated silk fibroin microparticles and possess optimal cell adhesion, migration, and proliferation properties. NB-modified silk fibroin microparticles can directly adhere to the cartilage and form a smooth layer on the surface via the photogenerated aldehyde group of NB reacting with the -NH2 groups of the cartilage tissue. JS-Paint treatment showed a significant promotion of cartilage regeneration and restored the smooth joint surface at 6 weeks postsurgery in a rabbit model of a partial-thickness cartilage defect. These findings revealed that silk fibroin can be utilized to bring about a tissue-adhesive paint. Thus, the JS-Paint strategy has some great potential to enhance joint surface regeneration and revolutionize future therapeutics of early and middle stages of osteoarthritis joint ailments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据