4.8 Article

MOF@COFs with Strong Multiemission for Differentiation and Ratiometric Fluorescence Detection

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 12, 期 18, 页码 20973-20981

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c04147

关键词

MOF@COF; multiemission; affinity and structure selectivity; ratiometric fluorescence sensing; visible detection

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21874074, 21675090]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aggregation-caused quenching (ACQ) is often observed in covalent organic frameworks (COFs) for their low emission. Here, we propose that limited COF layers form on UiO-66 to eliminate the ACQ by the formation of UiO@COF composites. UiO-66 is selected because this metal-organic framework (MOF) is easily prepared in nanosize with Zr4+ ion and 2-aminoterephthalic acid (BDC-NH2). The high affinity of the Zr4+ ion to phosphate species improves sensing selectivity. The surface -NH2 reacts with 2,4,6-triformylphloroglucinol (Tp) to integrate COF1 and COF2, which are prepared with Tp and phenylenediamine or tetraamino-tetraphenylethylene, respectively. The hydrogen bond formed between the hydroxyl group in Tp and imine nitrogen realizes excited-state intramolecular proton transfer; therefore, multiemission is observed from the enol and keto states of the COFs and UiO-66 at 360, 470, and 613 nm for UiO@COF1 and at 370, 470, and 572 nm for UiO@COF2. When phosphate ion is added in the composites, the emissions from the COFs keep stable, while that from UiO-66 is enhanced. However, adenosine-5'-triphosphate (ATP) improves the emissions from UiO-66 and COF's enol state, but that from the keto state keeps stable. The differentiation and ratiometric fluorescence detection of ATP and phosphate ion are therefore realized with the multiemission, the affinity of Zr4+ ions, and the structural selectivity of the COFs. Thus, UiO@COF is a novel strategy to integrate multiemission, affinity, and structural selectivity to improve the sensing performance for differentiation and ratiometric detection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据