4.8 Article

Photografting and Patterning of Poly(ethylene glycol) Methacrylate Hydrogel on Glass for Biochip Applications

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 12, 期 29, 页码 32233-32246

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c04085

关键词

chemical modifications of glass; photografting; hydrogels; quantitative imaging AFM; protein patterning; cell arrays

资金

  1. Euronanomed ERAnet project I-CARE (K-1)
  2. Research Council of Lithuania

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An efficient procedure for chemical initiator-free, in situ synthesis of a functional polyethylene glycol methacrylate (PEG MA) hydrogel on regular glass substrates is reported. It is demonstrated that self-initiated photografting and photopolymerization driven by UV irradiation can yield tens of nanometer-thick coatings of carboxy-functionalized PEG MA on the aldehyde terminated borosilicate glass surface. The most efficient formulation for hydrogel synthesis contained methyl methacrylic acid (MAA), 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), and PEG methacrylate (PEG(10)MA) monomers (1:1:1). The resulting HEMA/PEG(10)MA/MAA (HPMAA) coatings had a defined thickness in the range from 11 to 50 nm. The physicochemical properties of the synthesized HPMAA coatings were analyzed by combining water contact angle measurements, stylus profilometry, imaging null ellipsometry, and atomic force microscopy (AFM). The latter technique was employed in the quantitative imaging mode not only for direct probing of the surface topography but also for swelling behavior characterization in the pH range from 4.5 to 8.0. The estimated high swelling ratios of the HPMAA hydrogel (up to 3.2) together with its good stability and resistance to nonspecific protein binding were advantageous in extracellular matrix mimetics via patterning of fibronectin (FN) at a resolution close to 200 nm. It was shown that the fabricated FN micropatterns on HPMAA were equally suitable for single-cell arraying, as well as controlled cell culture lasting at least for 96 h.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据