4.8 Article

Evolution of the PtNi Bimetallic Alloy Fuel Cell Catalyst under Simulated Operational Conditions

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 12, 期 15, 页码 17602-17610

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c02083

关键词

fuel cells; bimetallic catalyst; dealloying; degradation; in situ electrochemical atomic force microscopy (EC-AFM); in situ grazing incidence small angle X-ray scattering (GISAXS); Ostwald ripening

资金

  1. SPL-MSB of EU [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_013/0001788]
  2. Czech Science Foundation [18-06989Y]
  3. CERIC-ERIC Consortium
  4. CERIC-ERIC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Comprehensive understanding of the catalyst corrosion dynamics is a prerequisite for the development of an efficient cathode catalyst in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. To reach this aim, the behavior of fuel cell catalysts must be investigated directly under reaction conditions. Herein, we applied a strategic combination of in situ/online techniques: in situ electrochemical atomic force microscopy, in situ grazing incidence small angle X-ray scattering, and electrochemical scanning flow cell with online detection by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. This combination of techniques allows in-depth investigation of the potential-dependent surface restructuring of a PtNi model thin film catalyst during potentiodynamic cycling in an aqueous acidic electrolyte. The study reveals a clear correlation between the upper potential limit and structural behavior of the PtNi catalyst, namely, its dealloying and coarsening. The results show that at 0.6 and 1.0 V-RHE upper potentials, the PtNi catalyst essentially preserves its structure during the entire cycling procedure. The crucial changes in the morphology of PtNi layers are found to occur at 1.3 and 1.5 V-RHE cycling potentials. Strong dealloying at the early stage of cycling is substituted with strong coarsening of catalyst particles at the later stage. The coarsening at the later stage of cycling is assigned to the electrochemical Ostwald ripening process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据