4.6 Article

Machine learning algorithms for structural performance classifications and predictions: Application to reinforced masonry shear walls

期刊

STRUCTURES
卷 22, 期 -, 页码 252-265

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2019.06.017

关键词

Classification; Clustering; Exploratory data analysis; Machine learning; Structural performance; Supervised learning; Unsupervised learning; Predictions

资金

  1. McMaster INTERFACE Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Current building codes and design standards classify different structural components according to their expected structural performance. Such classification is usually based on datasets of experimental results typically supplemented by analytical and/or numerical simulations. However, it is usually prohibitive to experimentally evaluate the influence of the typically large number of (and the wide numerical range of each of the) interacting design parameters, on the response of any one class of structural components. Subsequently, the current study builds on the recent advances in the area of machine learning (ML)-a class of artificial intelligence, to introduce a robust ML-based framework for performance prediction and classification of structural components. In order to demonstrate the use of the developed framework, a dataset of 97 reinforced masonry shear walls (RMSWs) is utilized. In this respect, the current study first conducts an exploratory data analysis to recognize the influence of the walls' geometrical and mechanical characteristics on the wall responses. Subsequently, an unsupervised learning algorithm is developed to cluster the walls based on their features. Finally, the training and validation datasets are used to further develop and validate a supervised learning algorithm to classify the walls and predict their lateral drifts according to their failure modes. The study is expected to introduce and demonstrate the capability of ML-based frameworks for future relevant studies within other structural engineering applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据