4.6 Review

Efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine for Tourette's syndrome: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

期刊

ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
卷 47, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2019.101853

关键词

Meta-analysis; Randomized controlled study; Tourette's syndrome; Traditional Chinese medicine

资金

  1. University of Macau [MYRG2015-00230-FHS, MYRG2016-00005-FHS]
  2. National Key Research & Development Program of China [2016YFC-1307200]
  3. Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program [PX2016028]
  4. Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals' Ascent Plan [DFL20151801]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has been widely used in the treatment of Tourette's Syndrome (TS). However, the efficacy and safety of TCM in treating TS are mixed across studies. This is a meta-analysis of studies on the efficacy and safety of TCM compared to placebo and Western medicine (WM). Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, SinoMed, and WanFang databases were systematically searched from inception date to October 16, 2018. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of TCM alone or TCM + WM combination for TS were included. Results: A total of 15 studies comprising 21 treatment trials (n = 2824) were included. TCM alone was more efficacious than placebo in terms of response rate (Relative Risk, RR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.55-2.47, P < 0.01, I-2 = 45 %) and the change in the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale total score (Standard mean difference, SMDs: -0.67, 95% CI: -0.81, -0.53, P < 0.01, I-2 = 0 %). The results remained positive when TCM alone was compared with WM alone (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.00-1.12, P = 0.03, I-2 = 29 %), and when TCM + WM were compared with WM alone (RR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.08-1.43, P < 0.01, I-2 = 0 %). Adverse drug reactions were more frequent in WM than in TCM groups (P < 0.05). WM type (P = 0.02), proportion of males (P = 0.03) and trial duration (P = 0.03) were significantly associated with response rate in TS patients when comparing TCM alone with WM alone. Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis support the efficacy and safety of TCM alone and TCM + WM in TS patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据